Skip to main content
The Review of Economic Studies
  • About
    • Charitable activities and donations
    • Restud Tours
    • History
    • Managing Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Accepted Papers
  • Latest News
  • Submissions
  • Published Papers

Accepted Papers

The Review of Economic Studies is one of the most highly respected academic journals in the field of economics. It is known for publishing leading research in all areas of economics, from microeconomics to macroeconomics. The journal is published by the Oxford University Press.

View published articles on Oxford University Press

New

Retractions: Updating from Complex Information

5 May 2025

Duarte Gonçalves, Jonathan Libgober, and Jack Willis

We modify a canonical experimental design to identify the effectiveness of retractions. Comparing beliefs after retractions to beliefs (a) without the retracted information and (b) after equivalent new information, we find that retractions result in diminished belief updating in both cases. We propose this reflects updating from retractions being more complex, and our analysis supports this: we find longer response times, lower accuracy, and higher variability.

New

Attention Utility: Evidence From Individual Investors

2 May 2025

Edika Quispe–Torreblanca, John Gathergood, George Loewenstein, and Neil Stewart

We study attention utility, the hedonic pleasure or pain derived purely from paying attention to information, which differs from the news utility that arises from gaining new information. The main, field, study examines brokerage account login data to show that investors pay disproportionate attention to already-known positive information on their stocks. Through its effect on logins, this selective attention affects their trading activity.

New

Trauma at School: The Impacts of Shootings on Students’ Human Capital and Economic Outcomes

2 May 2025

Marika Cabral, Bokyung Kim, Maya Rossin-Slater, Molly Schnell, and Hannes Schwandt

We examine how shootings at schools—an increasingly common form of gun violence in the United States—impact the educational and economic trajectories of students. Using linked schooling and labor market data in Texas from 1992 to 2018, we compare within-student and across-cohort changes in outcomes following a shooting to those experienced by students at matched control schools. We find that school shootings increase absenteeism and grade repetition; reduce high school graduation, college enrollment, and college completion; and reduce employment and earnings at ages 24–26.

New

Creating Cohesive Communities: A Youth Camp Experiment in India

12 April 2025

Arkadev Ghosh, Prerna Kundu, Matt Lowe, and Gareth Nellis

Non-family-based institutions for socializing young people may play a vital role in creating close-knit, inclusive communities. We study the potential for youth camps—integrating rituals, sports, and civics training—to strengthen intergroup cohesion. We randomly assigned Hindu and Muslim adolescent boys, from West Bengal, India, to two-week camps or to a pure control arm. To isolate mechanisms, we cross-randomized collective rituals (such as singing the national anthem, wearing uniforms, chanting support during matches, and synchronous dancing) and the intensity of intergroup contact.

New

Colluding against Environmental Regulation

9 April 2025

Jorge Alé-Chilet, Cuicui Chen, Jing Li, and Mathias Reynaert

We study collusion among firms against imperfectly monitored environmental regulation. Firms increase variable profits by violating regulation and reduce expected noncompliance penalties by violating jointly. We consider a case of three German automakers colluding to reduce the effectiveness of emissions control technology.

New

The Value of Privacy in Cartels: An Analysis of the Inner Workings of a Bidding Ring

9 April 2025

Kei Kawai, Jun Nakabayashi, and Juan Ortner

We study how incentive constraints can be relaxed by randomization in a repeated-game setting. Our study is motivated by the workings of a detected bidding cartel that adopted a protocol of keeping the winning bid secret from the designated losers when defection was a concern. Keeping the winning bid secret makes accurately undercutting the winning bid more difficult and makes defection less attractive as potential defectors risk not winning the auction even if they deviate.

New

Belief identification by proxy

9 April 2025

Elias Tsakas

It is well known that individual beliefs cannot be identified using traditional choice data, unless we exogenously assume state-independent utilities. In this paper, I propose a novel methodology that solves this long-standing identification problem in a simple way. This method relies on extending the state space by introducing a proxy, for which the agent has no stakes conditional on the original state space.

New

How People Use Statistics

2 April 2025

Pedro Bordalo, John Conlon, Nicola Gennaioli, Spencer Kwon, and Andrei Shleifer

For standard statistical problems, we provide new evidence documenting i) multi-modality and ii) instability in probability estimates, including from irrelevant changes in problem description. The evidence motivates a model in which, when solving a problem, people represent each hypothesis by attending to its salient features while neglecting other, potentially more relevant, ones. Only the statistics associated with salient features are used.

  • « Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • …
  • 42
  • Next »

Follow us

The Review of Economic Studies Follow

The official account of the Review of Economic Studies, one of the world's top economics journals.

RevEconStudies

"Winners of Excellence in Refereeing Award for 2024"

The Review of Economic Studies thanks all of the exceptional referees who have contributed their time & expertise to the journal.

Dan Cao @vudancao
Bruno Caprettini @brunocaprettini
Ryan Chahrour

1/2
(rest of the list 👇)

Reply on Twitter 1947374557557412135 Retweet on Twitter 1947374557557412135 5 Like on Twitter 1947374557557412135 30 Twitter 1947374557557412135
Retweet on Twitter The Review of Economic Studies Retweeted

Chris and I had the pleasure of writing a nontechnical summary of our forthcoming @RevEconStudies paper () in the @LSEUSAblog!

Reply on Twitter 1937860829950439852 Retweet on Twitter 1937860829950439852 4 Like on Twitter 1937860829950439852 16 Twitter 1937860829950439852
Retweet on Twitter The Review of Economic Studies Retweeted

I have always loved this paper. Glad to see it has a home now.

Reply on Twitter 1937169808627565007 Retweet on Twitter 1937169808627565007 2 Like on Twitter 1937169808627565007 10 Twitter 1937169808627565007
Retweet on Twitter The Review of Economic Studies Retweeted

Great paper

Reply on Twitter 1937156768297025984 Retweet on Twitter 1937156768297025984 21 Like on Twitter 1937156768297025984 208 Twitter 1937156768297025984
Load More
The Review of Economic Studies

The Review was founded in 1933 by a group of Economists from leading UK and US departments. It is now managed by European-based economists.

Read more

Contact details

Ann Law
Journal Manager
Editorial Office
The Review of Economic Studies
Email: ann.law @ restud.com

Submissions

To assist the Editorial Office in prompt processing of this high volume of papers authors are requested to follow these guidelines:

Submit a Paper

Subscriptions

Please visit our publisher, Oxford University Press for quotes on subscriptions.

Subscribe

  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

©2024 The Review of Economic Studies Web Designers - KD Web

Follow us