Skip to main content
The Review of Economic Studies
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • Charitable activities and donations
    • History
    • Managing Editors
    • Code of conduct
    • Research code of conduct
  • Accepted Papers
  • Latest News
  • Submissions
  • Published Papers
  • Restud Tours

Accepted Papers

The Review of Economic Studies is one of the most highly respected academic journals in the field of economics. It is known for publishing leading research in all areas of economics, from microeconomics to macroeconomics. The journal is published by the Oxford University Press.

View published articles on Oxford University Press

New

Customer Acquisition, Business Dynamism and Aggregate Growth

12 June 2026

Marek Ignaszak and Petr Sedláček

Business dynamism — the process of firm entry, growth and exit — lies at the heart of modern endogenous growth models. While productivity differences have traditionally been seen as the main driving forces of business dynamism, a growing body of evidence suggests that customer acquisition is at least as important. In light of this evidence, we propose a novel endogenous growth model in which innovating firms must first acquire customers to sell their products.

New

State Capacity as an Organizational Problem

12 June 2026

Nicola Mastrorocco and Edoardo Teso

We investigate how technologies that reduce the costs of monitoring by central authorities have shaped the historical transition from small patrimonial states to large bureaucratic organizations. Our analysis is based on a novel dataset that traces changes in the organizational structure and geographic presence of the U.S. federal government over the nineteenth century.

New

Competitive Advertising and Pricing

12 June 2026

Ilwoo Hwang, Kyungmin Kim, and Raphael Boleslavsky

We consider an oligopoly model in which each firm chooses not only its price but also its advertising strategy regarding how much, and what, product information to provide. To highlight firms’ strategic incentives, we impose no structural restrictions on feasible advertising content, so that each firm can disclose or conceal any information.

New

Insurer Risk and Public Risk-Sharing: Quantifying the Value of Reinsurance

12 June 2026

Paul H.S. Kim and Anran Li

We study the role of public risk-sharing in markets where firms face substantial cost uncertainty, focusing on public reinsurance in health insurance. We develop a model where insurers internalize cost uncertainty through risk charges that raise effective marginal costs, and create a role for reinsurance. Public reinsurance lowers both expected costs and cost volatility, particularly for smaller insurers, reducing prices and enhancing competition.

New

School Choice and the Housing Market

12 June 2026

Aram Grigoryan

I develop a unified theoretical framework with schools and residential choices to study the welfare consequences of public schools’ switching from the traditional neighborhood assignment to the deferred acceptance mechanism. I find that when families receive higher priorities at neighborhood schools, the deferred acceptance mechanism creates higher aggregate or utilitarian welfare than neighborhood assignment.

New

Peer Effects in Consideration and Preferences

9 June 2026

Nail Kashaev, Natalia Lazzati, and Ruli Xiao

We develop a general model of discrete choice that incorporates peer effects in preferences and consideration sets. We characterize the equilibrium behavior and establish conditions under which all parts of the model can be recovered from a sequence of choices. We allow peers to affect preferences, consideration, or both. We show that these peer-effect mechanisms have different behavioral implications in the data.

New

Unemployment Insurance, Starting Salaries, and Jobs: Evidence from Multi-state Firms

5 June 2026

Gordon B. Dahl and Matthew Knepper

We study the labor market effects of permanent 30-64% reductions in unemployment insurance benefits available in seven states. Leveraging linked firm-establishment data, we find that establishments based in reform states experience employment increases that are 0.8-1.3% larger than those of the same firm’s establishments in other states.

New

Spatial Implications of Telecommuting

5 June 2026

Matthew J. Delventhal and Andrii Parkhomenko

We build a quantitative spatial model in which some workers can substitute on-site effort with work done from home. Ability and propensity to telecommute vary by education and industry. We quantify our framework to match the distribution of jobs and residents across 4,502 U.S. locations. Then we simulate permanent increases in the attractiveness and productivity of telework that lead to greater adoption of hybrid and fully remote work.

  • « Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 58
  • Next »

Follow us

The Review of Economic Studies Follow

The official account of the Review of Economic Studies, one of the world's top economics journals.

RevEconStudies

Under Smooth Diagnostic Expectations overreaction increases smoothly with uncertainty, providing a micro-foundation for key properties of survey data and the business cycle.

New paper by @Francesco_Bia, @CosminIlut, and @hpfilter

https://www.restud.com/smooth-diagnostic-expectations/

#REStud
#EconX

Reply on Twitter 2077409366924263892 Retweet on Twitter 2077409366924263892 7 Like on Twitter 2077409366924263892 40 Twitter 2077409366924263892

New paper by Kwak

https://www.restud.com/when-is-separate-sales-optimal/

#REStud
#EconX
#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 2077377391932875126 Retweet on Twitter 2077377391932875126 Like on Twitter 2077377391932875126 14 Twitter 2077377391932875126

New paper by Kaila:

https://www.restud.com/how-do-people-react-to-income-based-fines-evidence-from-speeding-tickets-discontinuities/

#REStud
#EconX
#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 2077334277813940432 Retweet on Twitter 2077334277813940432 5 Like on Twitter 2077334277813940432 20 Twitter 2077334277813940432

The UK’s post-1963 Robbins Report university boom brought in less able students from advantaged backgrounds. Future expansions should target talented students facing socioeconomic barriers.

New paper by Ichino, Rustichini, and @giulio_zanella:

https://www.restud.com/college-cognitive-ability-and-socioeconomic-disadvantage-policy-lessons-from-the-uk-in-1960-2004/

#REStud

Reply on Twitter 2077006451751432518 Retweet on Twitter 2077006451751432518 5 Like on Twitter 2077006451751432518 33 Twitter 2077006451751432518
Load More
The Review of Economic Studies

The Review was founded in 1933 by a group of Economists from leading UK and US departments. It is now managed by European-based economists.

Read more

Contact details

Ann Law
Journal Manager
Editorial Office
The Review of Economic Studies
Email: ann.law @ restud.com

Submissions

To assist the Editorial Office in prompt processing of this high volume of papers authors are requested to follow these guidelines:

Submit a Paper

Subscriptions

Please visit our publisher, Oxford University Press for quotes on subscriptions.

Subscribe

  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

©2024 The Review of Economic Studies Web Designers - KD Web

Follow us