Skip to main content
The Review of Economic Studies
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • Charitable activities and donations
    • History
    • Managing Editors
    • Code of conduct
    • Research code of conduct
  • Accepted Papers
  • Latest News
  • Submissions
  • Published Papers
  • Restud Tours

Accepted Papers

The Review of Economic Studies is one of the most highly respected academic journals in the field of economics. It is known for publishing leading research in all areas of economics, from microeconomics to macroeconomics. The journal is published by the Oxford University Press.

View published articles on Oxford University Press

Retraction of: Growing up in a Recession

11 January 2023

This is a retraction of: Paola Giuliano, Antonio Spilimbergo, Growing up in a Recession, The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 81, Issue 2, April 2014, Pages 787–817.

Social Positions and Fairness Views on Inequality

5 January 2023

Kristoffer B. Hvidberg, Claus T. Kreiner, and Stefanie Stantcheva

We link survey data on Danish people’s perceived income positions and fairness views on inequality within various reference groups to administrative records on their reference groups, income histories, and life events. People are, on average, well-informed about the income levels of their reference groups.

A More Credible Approach to Parallel Trends

5 January 2023

Ashesh Rambachan and Jonathan Roth

This paper proposes tools for robust inference in difference-in-differences and event- study designs where the parallel trends assumption may be violated.

Bond Premium Cyclicality and Liquidity Traps

4 January 2023

Nicolas Caramp and Sanjay R. Singh

Safe asset shortages can expose an economy to liquidity traps. The nature of these traps is determined by the cyclicality of the bond premium. A counter-cyclical bond premium opens the possibility of expectations-driven liquidity traps in which small issuances of government debt crowd out private debt and reduce output.

Testing the Production Approach to Markup Estimation

4 January 2023

Devesh Raval

Under the production approach to markup estimation, any flexible input should recover the markup. I test this implication using manufacturing datasets from Chile, Colombia, India, Indonesia, the US, and Southern Europe, as well as store-level data from a major US retailer, and overwhelmingly reject that markups estimated using labor and materials have the same distribution.

A Welfare Analysis of Occupational Licensing in U.S. States

21 December 2022

Morris M. Kleiner and Evan J. Soltas

We assess the welfare consequences of occupational licensing for workers and consumers. We estimate a model of labor market equilibrium in which licensing restricts labor supply but also affects labor demand via worker quality and selection.

A Network Solution to Robust Implementation: the Case of Identical but Unknown Distributions

19 December 2022

Mariann Ollár and Antonio Penta

We study robust mechanism design in environments in which agents commonly believe that others’ types are identically distributed, but we do not assume that the actual distribution is common knowledge, nor that it is known to the designer.

More than a Penny’s Worth: Left-Digit Bias and Firm Pricing

13 December 2022

Avner Strulov-Shlain, University of Chicago, Booth School of Business

Firms arguably price at 99-ending prices because of left-digit bias—the tendency of consumers to perceive a $4.99 as much lower than a $5.00. Analysis of retail scanner data on 3500 products sold by 25 US chains provides robust support for this explanation.

  • « Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • …
  • 62
  • Next »

Follow us

The Review of Economic Studies Follow

The official account of the Review of Economic Studies, one of the world's top economics journals.

RevEconStudies

New apper by Atal, Cuesta, & Sæthre

https://www.restud.com/quality-regulation-and-competition-evidence-from-pharmaceutical-markets/

#REStud
#EconX
#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 2112437553475309568 Retweet on Twitter 2112437553475309568 9 Like on Twitter 2112437553475309568 21 Twitter 2112437553475309568

New paper by Melcangi

https://www.restud.com/the-marginal-propensity-to-hire/

#REStud
#EconX
#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 2112077217832316967 Retweet on Twitter 2112077217832316967 9 Like on Twitter 2112077217832316967 57 Twitter 2112077217832316967

New paper by Cavenaile, Celik, & Tian

https://www.restud.com/are-markups-too-high-competition-strategic-innovation-and-industry-dynamics/

#REStud
#EconX
#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 2111040312558649794 Retweet on Twitter 2111040312558649794 14 Like on Twitter 2111040312558649794 48 Twitter 2111040312558649794

Standard NK models find optimal inflation well below 2%, small welfare losses from business cycles and monetary policy is neutral in the long run.

In a new paper, @mirkoabbritti, @egostino and Weber show all three conclusions break with endogenous growth & DNWR.

1/5

Reply on Twitter 2108101870762017073 Retweet on Twitter 2108101870762017073 28 Like on Twitter 2108101870762017073 122 Twitter 2108101870762017073
The Review of Economic Studies

The Review was founded in 1933 by a group of Economists from leading UK and US departments. It is now managed by European-based economists.

Read more

Contact details

Ann Law
Journal Manager
Editorial Office
The Review of Economic Studies
Email: restud @ restud.com

Submissions

To assist the Editorial Office in prompt processing of this high volume of papers authors are requested to follow these guidelines:

Submit a Paper

Subscriptions

Please visit our publisher, Oxford University Press for quotes on subscriptions.

Subscribe

  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

©2026 The Review of Economic Studies Web Designers - KD Web

Follow us