Skip to main content
The Review of Economic Studies
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • Charitable activities and donations
    • History
    • Managing Editors
    • Code of conduct
    • Research code of conduct
  • Accepted Papers
  • Latest News
  • Submissions
  • Published Papers
  • Restud Tours

Accepted Papers

The Review of Economic Studies is one of the most highly respected academic journals in the field of economics. It is known for publishing leading research in all areas of economics, from microeconomics to macroeconomics. The journal is published by the Oxford University Press.

View published articles on Oxford University Press

Information Spillovers and Sovereign Debt: Theory Meets the Eurozone Crisis

18 February 2024

Harold L. Cole, Daniel Neuhann, and Guillermo Ordonez

We develop a theory of information spillovers in sovereign bond markets in which investors can learn about default risk before trading in primary and secondary markets. If primary markets are structured as multi-unit discriminatory-price auctions, an endogenous winner’s curse leads to strategic complementarities in information acquisition.

Inefficient Automation

18 February 2024

Martin Beraja and Nathan Zorzi

How should the government respond to automation? We study this question in a heterogeneous agent model that takes worker displacement seriously. We recognize that displaced workers face two frictions in practice: reallocation is slow and borrowing is limited. We analyze a second best problem where the government can tax automation but lacks redistributive tools to fully alleviate borrowing frictions. The equilibrium is (constrained) inefficient and automation is excessive.

Robust Implementation with Costly Information

11 February 2024

Harry Pei and Bruno Strulovici

We construct mechanisms that can robustly implement any desired social choice function when (i) agents may incur a cost to learn the state of the world, (ii) with small probability, agents’ preferences can be arbitrarily different from some baseline known to the mechanism designer, and (iii) the mechanism designer does not know agents’ beliefs and higher-order beliefs about one another’s preferences. The mechanisms we propose have a natural interpretation and do not require the mechanism designer to be able to verify the state ex post.

Labor Market Screening and the Design of Social Insurance: An Equilibrium Analysis of the Labor Market for the Disabled

11 February 2024

Naoki Aizawa, Soojin Kim, and Serena Rhee

This paper studies how firms’ screening incentives in the labor market affect the optimal design of social insurance programs and quantitatively assesses the U.S. disability policies accounting for firms’ screening of the disabled. We develop an equilibrium search model where workers with different productivities have heterogeneous preferences over non-wage benefits and firms cannot offer an employment contract that explicitly depends on worker types.

Optimal Allocation via Waitlists: Simplicity through Information Design

30 January 2024

Itai Ashlagi, Faidra Monachou, and Afshin Nikzad

We study nonmonetary markets where objects that arrive over time are allocated to unitdemand agents with private types, such as in the allocation of public housing or deceased-donor organs. An agent’s value for an object is supermodular in her type and the object quality, and her payoff is her value minus her waiting cost. The social planner’s objective is a weighted sum of allocative efficiency (i.e., the sum of values) and welfare (i.e., the sum of payoffs).

A Dynamic Model of Input-Output Networks

28 January 2024

Ernest Liu and Aleh Tsyvinski

We develop a dynamic model of input-output networks that incorporates adjustment costs of changing inputs. Our closed-form solution for the dynamics of the economy shows that temporary shocks to upstream sectors, whose output travels through long supply chains, have disproportionately significant welfare impact compared to affected sectors’ Domar weights.

The Work-From-Home Technology Boon and its Consequences

28 January 2024

Morris A. Davis, Andra C. Ghent, and Jesse Gregory

We study the impact of widespread adoption of work-from-home (WFH) technology using an equilibrium model where people choose where to live, how to allocate their time between working at home and at the office, and how much space to use in production. Motivated by cross-sectional evidence on WFH, we model WFH as a complement to work at the office.

The Climate in Climate Economics

21 January 2024

Doris Folini, Aleksandra Friedl, Felix Kübler, and Simon Scheidegger

To analyze climate change mitigation strategies, economists rely on simplified climate models — so-called climate emulators — that provide a realistic quantitative link between CO2 emissions and global warming at low computational costs. In this paper, we propose a generic and transparent calibration and evaluation strategy for these climate emulators that is based on freely and easily accessible state-of-the-art benchmark data from climate sciences. We demonstrate that the appropriate choice of the free model parameters can be of key relevance for the predicted social cost of carbon.

  • « Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • …
  • 50
  • Next »

Follow us

The Review of Economic Studies Follow

The official account of the Review of Economic Studies, one of the world's top economics journals.

RevEconStudies

New paper by Le Grand, Martin-Baillon & Ragot:

https://www.restud.com/should-monetary-policy-care-about-redistribution-optimal-monetary-and-fiscal-policy-with-heterogeneous-agents/

#REStud
#EconX
#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 2029913437573206037 Retweet on Twitter 2029913437573206037 18 Like on Twitter 2029913437573206037 64 Twitter 2029913437573206037

New paper by Ashraf, Bakhtin, Field, Voena, & Ziparo:

https://www.restud.com/gendered-spheres-of-learning-and-household-decision-making-over-fertility/

#REStud
#EconX
#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 2029891460011536518 Retweet on Twitter 2029891460011536518 4 Like on Twitter 2029891460011536518 20 Twitter 2029891460011536518

New paper by Christensen, Moon and Schorfheide:

https://restud.com/optimal-decision-rules-when-payoffs-are-partially-identified/
#REStud
#EconX
#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 2026966871782592564 Retweet on Twitter 2026966871782592564 3 Like on Twitter 2026966871782592564 23 Twitter 2026966871782592564

New paper by Mahajan, Michel and Tarozzi:

https://www.restud.com/identification-of-time-inconsistent-models-the-case-of-insecticide-treated-nets/

#REStud
#EconX
#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 2026966181702164915 Retweet on Twitter 2026966181702164915 4 Like on Twitter 2026966181702164915 15 Twitter 2026966181702164915
Load More
The Review of Economic Studies

The Review was founded in 1933 by a group of Economists from leading UK and US departments. It is now managed by European-based economists.

Read more

Contact details

Ann Law
Journal Manager
Editorial Office
The Review of Economic Studies
Email: ann.law @ restud.com

Submissions

To assist the Editorial Office in prompt processing of this high volume of papers authors are requested to follow these guidelines:

Submit a Paper

Subscriptions

Please visit our publisher, Oxford University Press for quotes on subscriptions.

Subscribe

  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

©2024 The Review of Economic Studies Web Designers - KD Web

Follow us