Accepted Papers

The Review of Economic Studies is one of the most highly respected academic journals in the field of economics. It is known for publishing leading research in all areas of economics, from microeconomics to macroeconomics. The journal is published by the Oxford University Press.

View published articles on Oxford University Press

Multi-Dimensional Screening: Buyer-Optimal Learning and Informational Robustness

Rahul Deb and Anne-Katrin Roesler

A monopolist seller of multiple goods screens a buyer whose type vector is initially unknown to both but drawn from a commonly known prior distribution. The seller chooses a mechanism to maximize her worst-case profits against all possible signals from which the buyer can learn about his values for the goods. We show that it is robustly optimal for the seller to bundle goods with identical demands (these are goods that can be permuted without changing the buyer’s prior type distribution).

Competition and Career Advancement

Julian V. Johnsen, Hyejin Ku, and Kjell G. Salvanes

In standard promotion tournaments, contestants are ranked based on their output or productivity. We argue that workers’ career progression may also depend on their relative rankings in dimensions a priori unrelated to their job performance, such as visibility or in-person presence. Such implicit tournaments may rationalize a variety of seemingly counterproductive practices in the workplace, including long working hours, low uptake of statutory leave, and presenteeism.

Path dependency in physician decisions

Lawrence Jin, Rui Tang, Han Ye, Junjian Yi, and Songfa Zhong

We examine path dependency in physician decisions in an emergency department setting, and find that physicians’ treatment decisions for the current and previous patients are positively correlated. We show that the positive autocorrelation is higher when the current patient is of greater medical uncertainty or more similar to the previous patient in terms of observed characteristics and when the physician is less experienced or more fatigued.

Follow us

The Review of Economic Studies Follow

The official account of the Review of Economic Studies, one of the world's top economics journals.

RevEconStudies

New paper, "Firm Quality Dynamics and the Slippery Slope of Credit Intervention" by @wenhaoli111 & Li shows that direct government and central bank lending can distort firm quality and fuel future interventions.

https://www.restud.com/firm-quality-dynamics-and-the-slippery-slope-of-credit-intervention/

#EconTwitter #REStud

Reply on Twitter 1994082299873231192 Retweet on Twitter 1994082299873231192 6 Like on Twitter 1994082299873231192 24 Twitter 1994082299873231192

"We show how opportunity costs, a core economic concept, can explain seemingly non-rational behaviour (like cyclical choices) within a preference-maximising framework."

New paper by @PaolaManzini, @MarcoMa75263273 & @ulkulev

#EconTwitter #REStud

https://www.restud.com/choice-and-opportunity-costs/

Reply on Twitter 1993605369310969935 Retweet on Twitter 1993605369310969935 15 Like on Twitter 1993605369310969935 53 Twitter 1993605369310969935

"Supply disruptions shapes the global internet backbone: new paper shows diversification drives cable entry & surplus, but markets may underprovide diversity."

New Paper by @CaouiHadi & Steck:

https://www.restud.com/diversification-market-entry-and-the-global-internet-backbone/

#EconTwitter #REStud

Reply on Twitter 1985707065827082266 Retweet on Twitter 1985707065827082266 14 Like on Twitter 1985707065827082266 34 Twitter 1985707065827082266

"Serfdom in early modern Russia wasn’t inevitable—it was driven by landholding soldiers on the southern frontier. To defend against nomads, the state tied peasants to land, cementing coercive labor."

New paper by @andreamatranga & @Natkhov:

https://www.restud.com/all-along-the-watchtower-military-landholders-and-serfdom-consolidation-in-early-modern-russia/
#econtwitter

Reply on Twitter 1985349137366499478 Retweet on Twitter 1985349137366499478 10 Like on Twitter 1985349137366499478 34 Twitter 1985349137366499478
Load More