Skip to main content
The Review of Economic Studies
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • Charitable activities and donations
    • History
    • Managing Editors
    • Code of conduct
    • Research code of conduct
  • Accepted Papers
  • Latest News
  • Submissions
  • Published Papers
  • Restud Tours

Accepted Papers

The Review of Economic Studies is one of the most highly respected academic journals in the field of economics. It is known for publishing leading research in all areas of economics, from microeconomics to macroeconomics. The journal is published by the Oxford University Press.

View published articles on Oxford University Press

Shallow Meritocracy

5 April 2024

Peter Andre

Meritocracies aspire to reward hard work and promise not to judge individuals by the circumstances into which they were born. However, circumstances often shape the choice to work hard. I show that people’s merit judgments are “shallow” and insensitive to this effect. They hold others responsible for their choices, even if these choices have been shaped by unequal circumstances. In an experiment, US participants judge how much money workers deserve for the effort they exert. Unequal circumstances disadvantage some workers and discourage them from working hard. Nonetheless, participants reward the effort of disadvantaged and advantaged workers identically, regardless of the circumstances under which choices are made.

Dynamic Perturbation

5 April 2024

Alessandro Mennuni, Juan Rubio-Ramirez, and Serhiy Stepanchuk

We present a novel algorithm called Dynamic Perturbation for solving large-scale macroeconomic models. Our approach involves computing first-order Taylor expansions of the policy functions along the entire equilibrium path. This method applies to a wide range of models and offers significantly higher accuracy than traditional perturbation approaches. Remarkably, even when utilizing first-order approximations, our method can effectively handle models with strong nonlinearities and occasionally binding constraints, such as the zero lower bound.

Interview Sequences and the Formation of Subjective Assessments

5 April 2024

Jonas Radbruch and Amelie Schiprowski

Interviewing is a decisive stage of most processes that match candidates to firms and organizations. This paper studies how and why a candidate’s interview outcome depends on the other candidates interviewed by the same evaluator. We use large-scale data from high-stakes admission and hiring processes, where candidates are quasi-randomly assigned to evaluators and time slots. We find that the individual assessment decreases as the quality of other candidates assigned to the same evaluator increases. The influence of the previous candidate stands out, leading to a negative autocorrelation in evaluators’ votes of up to 40% and distorting final admission and hiring decisions.

The Macroeconomics of Supply Chain Disruptions

5 April 2024

Daron Acemoglu and Alireza Tahbaz-Salehi

This paper develops a model to study the macroeconomic implications of supply chain disruptions with three key ingredients: (i) a firm-level network of customized supplier-customer links that generate relationship-specific productivity gains; (ii) bargaining over these relationship-specific surpluses; and (iii) an extensive margin of adjustment, whereby firms decide to form or sever relations with suppliers and customers.

Monopoly of Taxation Without a Monopoly of Violence: The Weak State’s Trade-Offs From Taxation

1 April 2024

Soeren J. Henn, Christian Mastaki Mugaruka, Miguel Ortiz, Raúl Sánchez de la Sierra, and David Qihang Wu

This study presents a new economic perspective on state-building based on a case study in the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s hinterland. We explore the implications for the state of considering rebels as stationary bandits. When the state, through a military operation, made it impossible for rebels to levy taxes, it inadvertently encouraged them to plunder the assets of the very citizens they previously preferred to tax.

Signaling with Private Monitoring

1 April 2024

Gonzalo Cisternas and Aaron Kolb

We study dynamic signaling when the sender does not see the signals that her actions generate. The sender then uses her past play to forecast what a receiver believes, in turn forcing the receiver to forecast the previous forecast, and so forth. We identify a class of linear-quadratic-Gaussian games where this endogenous higher-order uncertainty can be handled. The sender’s second-order belief is key: it is a private state that she controls, and it creates a new channel for information transmission.

The Heterogeneous Effects of Government Spending: It’s All about Taxes

25 March 2024

Axelle Ferriere and Gaston Navarro

Historically, large changes in U.S. government spending induced fiscal efforts that were not all alike, with some using more progressive taxes than others. We develop a heterogeneous-agent New Keynesian model to analyze how the distribution of taxes across households shapes spending multipliers. The model yields empirically realistic distributions in marginal propensities to consume and labor elasticities, which result in lower responsiveness to tax changes for higher-income earners. In turn, multipliers are larger when spending is financed with higher tax progressivity—that is, when the tax burden falls more heavily on higher-income earners.

Dynamic Demand Estimation in Auction Markets

25 March 2024

Matthew Backus and Gregory Lewis

We study demand estimation in a large auction market. In our model, a dynamically evolving population of buyers with unit demand and heterogeneous and privately known preferences for a finite set of differentiated products compete in a sequence of auctions that occur in discrete time. We define an empirically tractable equilibrium concept in which bidders behave as though they are competing with the stationary distribution of opposing bids, characterize bidding strategies, and prove existence of equilibrium. Having developed this demand system, we prove that it is non-parametrically identified from panel data.

  • « Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • …
  • 55
  • Next »

Follow us

The Review of Economic Studies Follow

The official account of the Review of Economic Studies, one of the world's top economics journals.

RevEconStudies

Improve your economic data analysis by using jackknife standard errors under clustering. This is a minor code change, and can lead to greatly improved inference. This paper provides the theoretical foundation.

New paper by @BruceEHansen

https://www.restud.com/jackknife-standard-errors-for-clustered-regression/

#REStud
#EconX

Reply on Twitter 2061710975128961390 Retweet on Twitter 2061710975128961390 65 Like on Twitter 2061710975128961390 268 Twitter 2061710975128961390

From 1 June 2026, the submission fee for the Review of Economic Studies will increase to USD 250, with the reduced student rate increasing to USD 150.

Full details are available on our website.

Reply on Twitter 2061452574000087157 Retweet on Twitter 2061452574000087157 1 Like on Twitter 2061452574000087157 15 Twitter 2061452574000087157

New paper by Aneja, Farina, and Xu:

https://www.restud.com/closing-gender-gaps-through-workplace-diversity-the-intergenerational-effects-of-world-war-i/

#REStud
#EconX
#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 2061400265039753492 Retweet on Twitter 2061400265039753492 8 Like on Twitter 2061400265039753492 38 Twitter 2061400265039753492

A new tractable model with persistent, spatially correlated utility explains a new fact about how migration evolves over time, with implications for dynamics and welfare.

New paper by @greg_l_howard & Shao:

https://www.restud.com/the-dynamics-of-internal-migration-a-new-fact-and-its-implications/

#REStud
#EconX
#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 2059275273258811547 Retweet on Twitter 2059275273258811547 15 Like on Twitter 2059275273258811547 79 Twitter 2059275273258811547
Load More
The Review of Economic Studies

The Review was founded in 1933 by a group of Economists from leading UK and US departments. It is now managed by European-based economists.

Read more

Contact details

Ann Law
Journal Manager
Editorial Office
The Review of Economic Studies
Email: ann.law @ restud.com

Submissions

To assist the Editorial Office in prompt processing of this high volume of papers authors are requested to follow these guidelines:

Submit a Paper

Subscriptions

Please visit our publisher, Oxford University Press for quotes on subscriptions.

Subscribe

  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

©2024 The Review of Economic Studies Web Designers - KD Web

Follow us