Skip to main content
The Review of Economic Studies
  • About
    • Charitable activities and donations
    • Restud Tours
    • History
    • Managing Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Accepted Papers
  • Latest News
  • Submissions
  • Published Papers

Posts

Overconfidence and Prejudice

9 June 2025

Paul Heidhues, Botond Kőszegi, and Philipp Strack

We develop a model of multi-dimensional misspecified learning in which an overconfident agent learns about groups in society from observations of his and others’ successes. We show that the average person sees his group relative to other groups too positively, and this in-group bias exhibits systematic comparative-statics patterns. First, a person is most likely to have negative opinions about other groups he competes with. Second, while information about another group’s achievements does not lower a person’s prejudice, information about economic or social forces affecting the group can, and personal contact with group members has a beneficial effect that is larger than in classical settings.

Community Enforcement with Endogenous Records

9 June 2025

Harry Pei

I study repeated games with anonymous random matching where players can add or remove signals from their records. The ability to manipulate records introduces monotonicity constraints on players’ continuation values, under which sufficiently long-lived players will almost never cooperate. When players’ expected lifespans are intermediate, their ability to sustain cooperation depends on (i) whether their actions are complements or substitutes and (ii) whether manipulation takes the form of adding or removing signals.

Behavioral Causal Inference

9 June 2025

Ran Spiegler

When inferring causal effects from correlational data, a common practice by professional researchers but also lay people is to control for potential confounders. Inappropriate controls produce erroneous causal inferences. I model decision-makers who use endogenous observational data to learn actions’ causal effect on payoff-relevant outcomes. Different decision-maker types use different controls. Their resulting choices affect the very correlations they learn from, thus calling for equilibrium analysis of the steady-state welfare cost of bad controls.

Making Decisions under Model Misspecification

9 June 2025

Simone Cerreia-Vioglio, Lars Peter Hansen, Fabio Maccheroni, and Massimo Marinacci

We use decision theory to confront uncertainty that is sufficiently broad to incorporate “models as approximations.” We presume the existence of a featured collection of what we call “structured models” that have explicit substantive motivations. The decision maker confronts uncertainty through the lens of these models, but also views these models as simplifications, and hence, as misspecified.

Demand Shocks as Technology Shocks

9 June 2025

Yan Bai, José-Víctor Ríos-Rull, and Kjetil Storesletten

We provide a macroeconomic theory where demand for goods has a productive role. A search friction prevents perfect matching between producers and potential customers. Larger demand induces more search, which in turn increases GDP and measured TFP. We embed the product-market friction in a standard neoclassical model and estimate it using Bayesian techniques.

Pseudo Lindahl Equilibrium as a Collective Choice Rule

8 June 2025

Faruk Gul and Wolfgang Pesendorfer

A collective choice problem specifies a finite set of alternatives from which a group of expected utility maximizers must choose. We associate a collective pseudo market with every collective choice problem and establish the existence and efficiency of pseudo Lindahl equilibrium (PLE) allocations. We also associate a cooperative bargaining problem with every collective choice problem and define a set-valued solution concept, the ω-weighted Nash bargaining set where ω is a vector of welfare weights. We provide axioms that characterize the ω-weighted Nash bargaining set.

Surviving Childhood: Effects of Removing a Child From Home

8 June 2025

Ronja Helénsdotter

This paper studies the effects of the court-ordered removal of children from home on health, crime, and education. To isolate causal effects, I exploit quasi-random variation in judge assignment together with across-judge variation in the tendency to favor removal in an instrumental variable (IV) design. Using a novel data set (N=26,579) based on Swedish court documents that I transcribe and link with detailed register data, I find that court-ordered out-of-home placement has large adverse effects on the mortality of the marginal child.

Good Dispersion, Bad Dispersion

8 June 2025

Matthias Kehrig and Nicolas Vincent

We document that most dispersion in marginal revenue products of inputs occurs across plants within firms rather than between firms. This is commonly thought to reflect misallocation: dispersion is “bad.” However, we show that eliminating frictions hampering internal capital markets in a multi-plant firm model may in fact increase productivity dispersion and raise output: dispersion can be “good.” This arises as firms optimally stagger investment activity across their plants over time to avoid raising costly external finance, instead relying on reallocating internal funds.

  • « Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • …
  • 49
  • Next »

Follow us

The Review of Economic Studies Follow

The official account of the Review of Economic Studies, one of the world's top economics journals.

RevEconStudies

"New study finds salary benchmarking cuts pay gaps by 25%. Pay dispersion partly arises from firms’ uncertainty about market rates, with key implications for pay transparency policy."

New paper from @pereztruglia, @zoebcullen, @ShengwuLi:

https://www.restud.com/whats-my-employee-worth-the-effects-of-salary-benchmarking/

#econtwitter

Reply on Twitter 1968264633686560917 Retweet on Twitter 1968264633686560917 1 Like on Twitter 1968264633686560917 13 Twitter 1968264633686560917

"Competition via repo contracts resolves the lemons problem! A closed-form solution
for the unique pooling equilibrium explains why markets feature high haircuts and
low repo rates."

New paper from @SakiBigio & @liyan_shi:

https://www.restud.com/repurchase-options-in-the-market-for-lemons/

#econtwitter
#REStud

Reply on Twitter 1968259737650446683 Retweet on Twitter 1968259737650446683 Like on Twitter 1968259737650446683 5 Twitter 1968259737650446683

"Wars disrupt supply chains, but firms adapt by reorganizing them. The 2014 war cut
Ukraine’s output in nonconflict areas by 5.5%, with one-third mitigated by link
reorganization."

New paper from @KorovkinVasily, @alexeymakarin & @MiyauchiYuhei:

https://www.restud.com/supply-chain-disruption-and-reorganization-theory-and-evidence-from-ukraines-war/
#REStud

Reply on Twitter 1968257548605440431 Retweet on Twitter 1968257548605440431 7 Like on Twitter 1968257548605440431 20 Twitter 1968257548605440431

Recently accepted to #REStud, "Normalizations and misspecification in skill formation models," from Joachim Freyberger:

https://www.restud.com/normalizations-and-misspecification-in-skill-formation-models/

Reply on Twitter 1966215956834693494 Retweet on Twitter 1966215956834693494 3 Like on Twitter 1966215956834693494 21 Twitter 1966215956834693494
Load More
The Review of Economic Studies

The Review was founded in 1933 by a group of Economists from leading UK and US departments. It is now managed by European-based economists.

Read more

Contact details

Ann Law
Journal Manager
Editorial Office
The Review of Economic Studies
Email: ann.law @ restud.com

Submissions

To assist the Editorial Office in prompt processing of this high volume of papers authors are requested to follow these guidelines:

Submit a Paper

Subscriptions

Please visit our publisher, Oxford University Press for quotes on subscriptions.

Subscribe

  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

©2024 The Review of Economic Studies Web Designers - KD Web

Follow us