Accepted Papers

The Review of Economic Studies is one of the most highly respected academic journals in the field of economics. It is known for publishing leading research in all areas of economics, from microeconomics to macroeconomics. The journal is published by the Oxford University Press.

View published articles on Oxford University Press

Discrimination in Hiring: Evidence from Retail Sales

Alan M. Benson, Simon Board, and Moritz Meyer-ter-vehn

We propose a simple model of racial bias in hiring that encompasses three major theories: taste-based discrimination, screening discrimination, and complementary production. We derive a test that can distinguish these theories based on the mean and variance of workers’ productivity under managers of different pairs of races. We apply this test to study discrimination at a major U.S. retailer using data from 48,755 newly-hired commission-based salespeople.

The Brexit Vote, Productivity Growth and Macroeconomic Adjustments in the United Kingdom

Ben Broadbent, Federico Di Pace, Thomas Drechsel, Richard Harrison, and Silvana Tenreyro

The UK economy experienced significant macroeconomic adjustments following the 2016 referendum on its withdrawal from the European Union. To understand these adjustments, this paper presents empirical facts using novel UK macroeconomic data and estimates a small open economy model with tradable and non-tradable sectors.

Taxes and Growth: New Narrative Evidence from Interwar Britain

James Cloyne, Nicholas Dimsdale, and Natacha Postel-Vinay

The impact of fiscal policy on economic activity is still a matter of great debate. And, ever since Keynes first commented on it, interwar Britain, 1918-1939, has remained a particularly interesting and contentious case — not least because of its high debt environment and turbulent business cycle. This debate has often focused on the effects of government spending, but little is known about the effects of tax changes.

Strategic Exploration: Preemption and Prioritization

Qingmin Liu and Yu Fu Wong

This paper analyzes a model of strategic exploration in which competing players independently explore a set of alternatives. The model features a multiple-player multiple-armed bandit problem and captures a strategic trade-off between preemption—covert exploration of alternatives that the opponent will explore in the future—and prioritization—exploration of the most promising alternatives. Our results explain how the strategic trade-off shapes equilibrium behaviors and outcomes, e.g., in technology races between superpowers and R&D competitions between firms.

On the Use of Outcome Tests for Detecting Bias in Decision Making

Ivan A. Canay, Magne Mogstad, and Jack Mountjoy

The decisions of judges, lenders, journal editors, and other gatekeepers often lead to significant disparities across affected groups. An important question is whether, and to what extent, these group-level disparities are driven by relevant differences in underlying individual characteristics, or by biased decision makers. Becker (1957, 1993) proposed an outcome test of bias based on differences in post-decision outcomes across groups, inspiring a large and growing empirical literature.

Follow us

The Review of Economic Studies Follow

The official account of the Review of Economic Studies, one of the world's top economics journals.

RevEconStudies

New paper by Ashraf, Bakhtin, Field, Voena, & Ziparo:

https://www.restud.com/gendered-spheres-of-learning-and-household-decision-making-over-fertility/

#REStud
#EconX
#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 2029891460011536518 Retweet on Twitter 2029891460011536518 1 Like on Twitter 2029891460011536518 2 Twitter 2029891460011536518

New paper by Christensen, Moon and Schorfheide:

https://restud.com/optimal-decision-rules-when-payoffs-are-partially-identified/
#REStud
#EconX
#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 2026966871782592564 Retweet on Twitter 2026966871782592564 2 Like on Twitter 2026966871782592564 23 Twitter 2026966871782592564

New paper by Mahajan, Michel and Tarozzi:

https://www.restud.com/identification-of-time-inconsistent-models-the-case-of-insecticide-treated-nets/

#REStud
#EconX
#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 2026966181702164915 Retweet on Twitter 2026966181702164915 3 Like on Twitter 2026966181702164915 13 Twitter 2026966181702164915
Load More