Accepted Papers

The Review of Economic Studies is one of the most highly respected academic journals in the field of economics. It is known for publishing leading research in all areas of economics, from microeconomics to macroeconomics. The journal is published by the Oxford University Press.

View published articles on Oxford University Press

Minimum Wage Employment Effects and Labor Market Concentration

José Azar, Emiliano Huet-Vaughn, Ioana Marinescu, Bledi Taska, and Till von Wachter

This paper shows that more highly concentrated labor markets experience more positive employment effects of the minimum wage. In the most concentrated labor markets, employment rises following a minimum wage increase. The paper establishes its main findings studying the effects of local minimum wage increases on a key low-wage retail sector, and using data on labor market concentration that covers the entirety of the United States with fine spatial variation at the occupation level.

Discrimination in Hiring: Evidence from Retail Sales

Alan M. Benson, Simon Board, and Moritz Meyer-ter-vehn

We propose a simple model of racial bias in hiring that encompasses three major theories: taste-based discrimination, screening discrimination, and complementary production. We derive a test that can distinguish these theories based on the mean and variance of workers’ productivity under managers of different pairs of races. We apply this test to study discrimination at a major U.S. retailer using data from 48,755 newly-hired commission-based salespeople.

The Brexit Vote, Productivity Growth and Macroeconomic Adjustments in the United Kingdom

Ben Broadbent, Federico Di Pace, Thomas Drechsel, Richard Harrison, and Silvana Tenreyro

The UK economy experienced significant macroeconomic adjustments following the 2016 referendum on its withdrawal from the European Union. To understand these adjustments, this paper presents empirical facts using novel UK macroeconomic data and estimates a small open economy model with tradable and non-tradable sectors.

Taxes and Growth: New Narrative Evidence from Interwar Britain

James Cloyne, Nicholas Dimsdale, and Natacha Postel-Vinay

The impact of fiscal policy on economic activity is still a matter of great debate. And, ever since Keynes first commented on it, interwar Britain, 1918-1939, has remained a particularly interesting and contentious case — not least because of its high debt environment and turbulent business cycle. This debate has often focused on the effects of government spending, but little is known about the effects of tax changes.

Strategic Exploration: Preemption and Prioritization

Qingmin Liu and Yu Fu Wong

This paper analyzes a model of strategic exploration in which competing players independently explore a set of alternatives. The model features a multiple-player multiple-armed bandit problem and captures a strategic trade-off between preemption—covert exploration of alternatives that the opponent will explore in the future—and prioritization—exploration of the most promising alternatives. Our results explain how the strategic trade-off shapes equilibrium behaviors and outcomes, e.g., in technology races between superpowers and R&D competitions between firms.

On the Use of Outcome Tests for Detecting Bias in Decision Making

Ivan A. Canay, Magne Mogstad, and Jack Mountjoy

The decisions of judges, lenders, journal editors, and other gatekeepers often lead to significant disparities across affected groups. An important question is whether, and to what extent, these group-level disparities are driven by relevant differences in underlying individual characteristics, or by biased decision makers. Becker (1957, 1993) proposed an outcome test of bias based on differences in post-decision outcomes across groups, inspiring a large and growing empirical literature.

Follow us

The Review of Economic Studies Follow

The official account of the Review of Economic Studies, one of the world's top economics journals.

RevEconStudies

In their paper, recently accepted to #REStud, Milgrom & Watt @MitchLWatt introduce “Walrasian markup mechanisms”—feasible, nearly efficient, and nearly incentive compatible mechanisms for nonconvex markets using linear prices.

https://www.restud.com/a-walrasian-mechanism-with-markups-for-nonconvex-markets/

#econtwitter

Reply on Twitter 1952475860185096331 Retweet on Twitter 1952475860185096331 8 Like on Twitter 1952475860185096331 28 Twitter 1952475860185096331

In their paper, recently accepted to #REStud, Frakes @MichaelFrakes2 and Gruber find a reduction in racial health disparities among chronic-disease patients following an increase in the racial diversity of the surrounding medical providers.

https://www.restud.com/the-effect-of-provider-diversity-on-racial-health-disparities-evidence-from-the-military/

#econtwitter

Reply on Twitter 1952458235639656871 Retweet on Twitter 1952458235639656871 1 Like on Twitter 1952458235639656871 5 Twitter 1952458235639656871

"State schools aimed to secularize Indonesia, but religious schools adapted, competing for students and strengthening Islamic identity instead."

Recently accepted to #REStud, from @samuelbazzi, Hilmy and @benjaminmarx:

https://www.restud.com/religion-education-and-the-state/

#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 1952115679513223439 Retweet on Twitter 1952115679513223439 50 Like on Twitter 1952115679513223439 185 Twitter 1952115679513223439

Recently accepted to #REStud, "Homeownership, Polarization, and Inequality," from Andrii Parkhomenko:

https://www.restud.com/homeownership-polarization-and-inequality/

#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 1952113714456383537 Retweet on Twitter 1952113714456383537 19 Like on Twitter 1952113714456383537 89 Twitter 1952113714456383537
Load More