Skip to main content
The Review of Economic Studies
  • About
    • Charitable activities and donations
    • Restud Tours
    • History
    • Managing Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Accepted Papers
  • Latest News
  • Submissions
  • Published Papers

Accepted Papers

The Review of Economic Studies is one of the most highly respected academic journals in the field of economics. It is known for publishing leading research in all areas of economics, from microeconomics to macroeconomics. The journal is published by the Oxford University Press.

View published articles on Oxford University Press

Optimal Allocation via Waitlists: Simplicity through Information Design

30 January 2024

Itai Ashlagi, Faidra Monachou, and Afshin Nikzad

We study nonmonetary markets where objects that arrive over time are allocated to unitdemand agents with private types, such as in the allocation of public housing or deceased-donor organs. An agent’s value for an object is supermodular in her type and the object quality, and her payoff is her value minus her waiting cost. The social planner’s objective is a weighted sum of allocative efficiency (i.e., the sum of values) and welfare (i.e., the sum of payoffs).

A Dynamic Model of Input-Output Networks

28 January 2024

Ernest Liu and Aleh Tsyvinski

We develop a dynamic model of input-output networks that incorporates adjustment costs of changing inputs. Our closed-form solution for the dynamics of the economy shows that temporary shocks to upstream sectors, whose output travels through long supply chains, have disproportionately significant welfare impact compared to affected sectors’ Domar weights.

The Work-From-Home Technology Boon and its Consequences

28 January 2024

Morris A. Davis, Andra C. Ghent, and Jesse Gregory

We study the impact of widespread adoption of work-from-home (WFH) technology using an equilibrium model where people choose where to live, how to allocate their time between working at home and at the office, and how much space to use in production. Motivated by cross-sectional evidence on WFH, we model WFH as a complement to work at the office.

The Climate in Climate Economics

21 January 2024

Doris Folini, Aleksandra Friedl, Felix Kübler, and Simon Scheidegger

To analyze climate change mitigation strategies, economists rely on simplified climate models — so-called climate emulators — that provide a realistic quantitative link between CO2 emissions and global warming at low computational costs. In this paper, we propose a generic and transparent calibration and evaluation strategy for these climate emulators that is based on freely and easily accessible state-of-the-art benchmark data from climate sciences. We demonstrate that the appropriate choice of the free model parameters can be of key relevance for the predicted social cost of carbon.

Marriage Market and Labor Market Sorting

21 January 2024

Paula Calvo, Ilse Lindenlaub, and Ana Reynoso

We develop a new equilibrium model in which households’ labor supply choices form the link between sorting on the marriage market and sorting on the labor market. We first show that in theory, the nature of home production—whether partners’ hours are complements or substitutes—shapes equilibrium labor supply as well as marriage and labor market sorting. We then estimate our model using German data to empirically assess the nature of home production, and find that spouses’ home hours are complements.

Information Aggregation Under Ambiguity: Theory and Experimental Evidence

16 January 2024

Spyros Galanis, Christos A. Ioannou, and Stelios Kotronis

We study information aggregation in a dynamic trading model. We show theoretically that separable securities, introduced by Ostrovsky (2012) in the context of Expected Utility, no longer aggregate information if some traders have imprecise beliefs and are ambiguity averse. Moreover, these securities are prone to manipulation as the degree of information aggregation can be influenced by the initial price set by the uninformed market maker.

Stability in Large Markets

16 January 2024

Ravi Jagadeesan and Karolina Vocke

In matching models, pairwise stable outcomes do not generally exist without substantial restrictions on both preferences and the topology of the network of contracts. We address the foundations of matching markets by developing a matching model with a continuum of agents that allows for arbitrary preferences and network structures. We show that pairwise stable outcomes are guaranteed to exist.

Motives and Consequences of Libor Strategic Reporting: How Much Can We Learn from Banks’ Self-Reported Borrowing Rates?

14 January 2024

Pietro Bonaldi

Libor is an estimate of interbank borrowing costs computed daily from rates reported by a fixed panel of banks. Evidence suggests that banks have manipulated Libor in recent years by misreporting their borrowing costs. I estimate a strategic reporting model that identifies banks’ borrowing costs as well as their motives for misreporting. The estimation places a lower bound on the value that Libor would have had if banks had truthfully reported their borrowing costs.

  • « Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • …
  • 45
  • Next »

Follow us

The Review of Economic Studies Follow

The official account of the Review of Economic Studies, one of the world's top economics journals.

RevEconStudies

Recently accepted to #REStud, "Normalizations and misspecification in skill formation models," from Joachim Freyberger:

https://www.restud.com/normalizations-and-misspecification-in-skill-formation-models/

Reply on Twitter 1966215956834693494 Retweet on Twitter 1966215956834693494 3 Like on Twitter 1966215956834693494 21 Twitter 1966215956834693494

"In a large RCT on a credit card in Mexico, cutting rates and raising minimums barely reduced default. Job loss—more disruptive to cash flow—had far greater impact."

New paper from Castellanos, @d_jimenez, @aprajitmahajan, Prous & @SeiraEnrique:

https://www.restud.com/contract-terms-employment-shocks-and-default-in-credit-cards/

#REStud

Reply on Twitter 1966208088677155243 Retweet on Twitter 1966208088677155243 8 Like on Twitter 1966208088677155243 26 Twitter 1966208088677155243

Recently accepted to #REStud, "On the optimal design of a Financial Stability Fund," from Ábraham, Carceles-Poveda, Liu and Marimon:

https://www.restud.com/on-the-optimal-design-of-a-financial-stability-fund/

#econtwitter

Reply on Twitter 1966205885287637462 Retweet on Twitter 1966205885287637462 6 Like on Twitter 1966205885287637462 32 Twitter 1966205885287637462
Retweet on Twitter The Review of Economic Studies Retweeted

I'm glad this is finally out after several years in the works! I’m also on the academic job market this year and happy to connect with anyone to discuss potential opportunities

Reply on Twitter 1959676420566986835 Retweet on Twitter 1959676420566986835 25 Like on Twitter 1959676420566986835 172 Twitter 1959676420566986835
Load More
The Review of Economic Studies

The Review was founded in 1933 by a group of Economists from leading UK and US departments. It is now managed by European-based economists.

Read more

Contact details

Ann Law
Journal Manager
Editorial Office
The Review of Economic Studies
Email: ann.law @ restud.com

Submissions

To assist the Editorial Office in prompt processing of this high volume of papers authors are requested to follow these guidelines:

Submit a Paper

Subscriptions

Please visit our publisher, Oxford University Press for quotes on subscriptions.

Subscribe

  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

©2024 The Review of Economic Studies Web Designers - KD Web

Follow us