Accepted Papers

The Review of Economic Studies is one of the most highly respected academic journals in the field of economics. It is known for publishing leading research in all areas of economics, from microeconomics to macroeconomics. The journal is published by the Oxford University Press.

View published articles on Oxford University Press

Cascades and Fluctuations in an Economy with an Endogenous Production Network

Mathieu Taschereau-Dumouchel

This paper studies the efficient allocation in an economy in which firms are connected through input-output linkages and must pay a fixed cost to produce. When economic conditions are poor, some firms might decide not to operate, thereby severing the links with their neighbors and changing the structure of the production network. Since producers benefit from having access to additional suppliers, nearby firms tend to operate, or not, together. As a result, the production network features clusters of operating firms, and the exit of a producer can create a cascade of firm shutdowns.

The Economics and Econometrics of Gene – Environment Interplay

Pietro Biroli, Titus Galama, Stephanie von Hinke, Hans van Kippersluis, Cornelius A. Rietveld, and Kevin Thom

We discuss how to estimate the interplay between genes (nature) and environments (nurture), with an empirical illustration of the moderating effect of school-starting age on one’s genetic predisposition towards educational attainment. We argue that gene–environment (G × E) studies can be instrumental for (i) assessing treatment effect heterogeneity, (ii) testing theoretical predictions, and (iii) uncovering mechanisms, thereby improving understanding of how (policy) interventions affect population subgroups.

A Q-theory of Banks

Juliane Begenau, Saki Bigio, Jeremy Majerovitz, and Matias Vieyra

Bank capital requirements are based on book values, which are slow to reflect losses. In this paper, we develop a dynamic model of banks to study the interaction of regulation and delayed accounting. Our model explains four stylized facts: book and market values diverge during crises, the market-to-book ratio predicts future profitability, book leverage constraints rarely bind strictly even as market leverage fans out during crises, and banks delever gradually after net-worth shocks.

Pareto Improvements in the Contest for College Admissions

Kala Krishna, Sergey Lychagin, Wojciech Olszewski, Ron Siegel, and Chloe Tergiman

Many countries base college admissions on a centrally-administered test. Students invest a great deal of resources to improve their performance on the test, and there is growing concern about the high costs associated with these activities. We consider modifying the test by introducing performance-disclosure policies that pool intervals of performance rankings. Pooling affects the equilibrium allocation of students to colleges, which hurts some students and benefits others, but also affects students’ effort.

How Important Is Health Inequality for Lifetime Earnings Inequality?

Roozbeh Hosseini, Karen Kopecky, and Kai Zhao

Using a dynamic panel approach, we provide empirical evidence that negative health shocks significantly reduce earnings. The effect is primarily driven by the participation margin and is concentrated among the less educated and those in poor health. Next, we develop a life cycle model of labor supply featuring risky and heterogeneous frailty profiles that affect individuals’ productivity, likelihood of access to social insurance, disutility from work, mortality, and medical expenses.

Efficient Conservation of the Brazilian Amazon: Estimates from a Dynamic Model

Rafael Araujo, Francisco Costa, and Marcelo Sant'Anna

This paper estimates the Brazilian Amazon’s carbon-efficient forest cover – i.e. when farmers internalize the social cost of carbon. We propose a dynamic discrete choice land-use model and estimate it using a panel of land use and carbon stock of 5.7 billion pixels between 2008 and 2017. The business-as-usual scenario implies an inefficient release of 42 billion tons of CO2 in the long run resulting from the deforestation of an area twice the size of France.

Barriers to Entry and Regional Economic Growth in China

Loren Brandt, Gueorgui Kambourov, and Kjetil Storesletten

Labor productivity in manufacturing differs starkly across regions in China. We document that productivity, wages, and start-up rates of non-state firms have nevertheless experienced rapid unconditional regional convergence after 1995. To analyze these patterns, we construct a Hopenhayn (1992) model that incorporates location-specific capital wedges, output wedges, and entry barriers. Using Chinese Industry Census data we estimate these wedges and examine their role in explaining differences in performance and growth across prefectures.

Retractions: Updating from Complex Information

Duarte Gonçalves, Jonathan Libgober, and Jack Willis

We modify a canonical experimental design to identify the effectiveness of retractions. Comparing beliefs after retractions to beliefs (a) without the retracted information and (b) after equivalent new information, we find that retractions result in diminished belief updating in both cases. We propose this reflects updating from retractions being more complex, and our analysis supports this: we find longer response times, lower accuracy, and higher variability.

Follow us

The Review of Economic Studies Follow

The official account of the Review of Economic Studies, one of the world's top economics journals.

RevEconStudies

"We prove a CLT for strategic network formation with homophilous agents. This enables inference on statistics derived from a single large network. We discuss practical procedures."

New Paper by Leung & Moon:

https://www.restud.com/normal-approximation-in-large-network-models/

#REStud
#EconX
#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 2034586724051857572 Retweet on Twitter 2034586724051857572 8 Like on Twitter 2034586724051857572 27 Twitter 2034586724051857572

"A new theory on how regional shocks affect aggregate welfare—applied to US highway network improvements—unpacking how and why it deviates from the Fogel/Hulten characterization."

New paper by @MiyauchiYuhei, @EricDonald, & Fukui:

https://www.restud.com/unpacking-aggregate-welfare-in-a-spatial-economy/

#REStud

Reply on Twitter 2033827362492625267 Retweet on Twitter 2033827362492625267 10 Like on Twitter 2033827362492625267 60 Twitter 2033827362492625267

New paper by Campos-Mercade, Goette, Graeber, Kellogg, and Sprenger:

https://www.restud.com/de-gustibus-and-disputes-about-reference-dependence/

#REStud
#EconX
#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 2033469744192344555 Retweet on Twitter 2033469744192344555 2 Like on Twitter 2033469744192344555 14 Twitter 2033469744192344555

New paper by Le Grand, Martin-Baillon & Ragot:

https://www.restud.com/should-monetary-policy-care-about-redistribution-optimal-monetary-and-fiscal-policy-with-heterogeneous-agents/

#REStud
#EconX
#EconTwitter

Reply on Twitter 2029913437573206037 Retweet on Twitter 2029913437573206037 18 Like on Twitter 2029913437573206037 64 Twitter 2029913437573206037
Load More