Accepted Papers

The Review of Economic Studies is one of the most highly respected academic journals in the field of economics. It is known for publishing leading research in all areas of economics, from microeconomics to macroeconomics. The journal is published by the Oxford University Press.

View published articles on Oxford University Press

New

Religion, Education, and the State

Samuel Bazzi, Masyhur Hilmy, and Benjamin Marx

This paper explores how state and religious providers of education compete during the nation building process. Using novel administrative data, we characterize the evolution of Indonesia’s Islamic education system and religious school choice after the introduction of mass public primary schooling in the 1970s. Funded through informal taxation, Islamic schools competed with the state by entering in the same markets. While primary enrollment shifted towards state schools, religious education increased overall as Islamic schools absorbed growing demand for secondary education.

New

Homeownership, Polarization, and Inequality

Andrii Parkhomenko

Why are job polarization and income inequality higher in large U.S. cities? I offer a new explanation: when house prices grow faster in large cities, middle-income households increasingly cannot afford to own a house there. They move to smaller cities and the middle of the income distribution in large cities hollows out, making them more polarized and unequal. I document that (1) cities with higher price growth experienced larger polarization and increase in inequality since 1980 and (2) middle-income households migrate more often to cheaper locations for housing-related reasons than low- or high-income households.

New

Policy Diffusion and Polarization across U.S. States

Stefano DellaVigna and Woojin Kim

Economists have studied the impact of numerous state laws, from welfare rules to voting ID requirements. Yet for all this policy evaluation, what do we know about policy diffusion—how these policies are introduced and spread from state to state? We present a series of facts based on a data set of 602 U.S. state policies spanning the past 7 decades. First, proxies of state capacity do not predict a higher likelihood of innovating new policies, but the political leaning of the state does predict a higher likelihood of introducing partisan laws since 1990.

New

The value of information in a congested fishery

Gabriel Englander, Larry Karp, and Leo Simon

We model a fishery with potential congestion, in which firms obtain public and private signals about the location of the densest fish stock. We analytically determine the regions of parameter space where greater precision of public and/or private information increases welfare, and we examine the effects of two types of information sharing. Using high-resolution data from the world’s largest fishery, we estimate the structural model. Point estimates imply that more precise private information raises welfare, whereas more precise public information has a negligible effect on welfare.

New

Women in the Courtroom: Technology and Justice

Heng Chen, Yuyu Chen, and Qingxu Yang

Our study analyzes 6 million civil judgments in China from 2014 to 2018, documenting gender disparities that disfavor female litigants. We investigate the impact of an open justice reform that mandated courts to broadcast legal proceedings live on a centralized online platform. By exploiting variations in its implementation across courts and over time and employing both difference-in-differences and Bartik IV approaches, we find that gender disparities in chances of winning decrease as broadcast intensity increases.

New

The Geography of Business Dynamism and Skill-Biased Technical Change

Hannah Rubinton

This paper shows that the growing disparities between big and small cities in the U.S. since 1980 can be explained by firms endogenously responding to a skill-biased technology shock. With the introduction of a new skill-biased technology that is high fixed cost but low marginal cost, firms endogenously adopt more in big cities, cities that offer abundant amenities for high-skilled workers, and cities that are more productive in using high-skilled labor.

New

Reallocative Auctions and Core Selection

Marzena Rostek and Nathan Yoder

When selling goods like wireless spectrum or electricity contracts, designers often opt for core-selecting mechanisms — i.e., those that induce outcomes in the core — in order to balance revenue and efficiency goals. But increasingly, auctions — such as the FCC’s Incentive Auction and those explored for natural resources — seek to reallocate goods, not just sell them. We show that when bidders can both buy and sell, substitutability among goods is no longer sufficient or necessary for core selection.

New

Estimating Welfare Effects in a Nonparametric Choice Model: The Case of School Vouchers

Vishal Kamat and Samuel Norris

We develop new robust discrete choice tools to learn about the average willingness to pay for a price subsidy and its effects on demand given exogenous, discrete variation in prices. Our starting point is a nonparametric, nonseparable model of choice. We exploit the insight that our welfare parameters in this model can be expressed as functions of demand for the different alternatives. However, while the variation in the data reveals the value of demand at the observed prices, the parameters generally depend on its values beyond these prices.

Follow us

The Review of Economic Studies Follow

The official account of the Review of Economic Studies, one of the world's top economics journals.

RevEconStudies

Recently accepted to #REStud, "Normalizations and misspecification in skill formation models," from Joachim Freyberger:

https://www.restud.com/normalizations-and-misspecification-in-skill-formation-models/

Reply on Twitter 1966215956834693494 Retweet on Twitter 1966215956834693494 3 Like on Twitter 1966215956834693494 21 Twitter 1966215956834693494

"In a large RCT on a credit card in Mexico, cutting rates and raising minimums barely reduced default. Job loss—more disruptive to cash flow—had far greater impact."

New paper from Castellanos, @d_jimenez, @aprajitmahajan, Prous & @SeiraEnrique:

https://www.restud.com/contract-terms-employment-shocks-and-default-in-credit-cards/

#REStud

Reply on Twitter 1966208088677155243 Retweet on Twitter 1966208088677155243 8 Like on Twitter 1966208088677155243 25 Twitter 1966208088677155243

Recently accepted to #REStud, "On the optimal design of a Financial Stability Fund," from Ábraham, Carceles-Poveda, Liu and Marimon:

https://www.restud.com/on-the-optimal-design-of-a-financial-stability-fund/

#econtwitter

Reply on Twitter 1966205885287637462 Retweet on Twitter 1966205885287637462 6 Like on Twitter 1966205885287637462 32 Twitter 1966205885287637462
Retweet on Twitter The Review of Economic Studies Retweeted

I'm glad this is finally out after several years in the works! I’m also on the academic job market this year and happy to connect with anyone to discuss potential opportunities

Reply on Twitter 1959676420566986835 Retweet on Twitter 1959676420566986835 25 Like on Twitter 1959676420566986835 173 Twitter 1959676420566986835
Load More